• Skip to main content

gavoweb

spiritual | cultural | technological life

homosexuality

Homosexuality is Bad : Orientation is Good

April 23, 2014 By Gavin Richardson

homosexuality bad orientation is good, what we are actually talking about

homosexuality bad orientation is good, what we are actually talking about

My friend Ben tipped me off to this posting on the problems with using the word “homosexuality” with the debate/conversation/argument (pick however you engage this) over the gay community, sin, marriage, etc.

Years ago one of my friends had shared with me that ‘he was gay and not homosexual’ and would rather I not use the term homosexual (or homosexuality). So out of respect and trying to be a peace maker in all these conversations I’ve tended to identify someone as ‘gay’ or reference the greater group as ‘gay community’. I hope that I did that well.

Justin in his “The Problem with “Homosexuality”“ puts out some rather helpful, and oddly common sense, words for a more healthy way of framing a gay, lesbian, bi-sexual sexuality conversation.

There are basically four different things someone might mean when they say “homosexuality,” and they are often confused.

1. Orientation. A person’s orientation tells you only who they are emotionally and physically attracted to. I call myselfgay because that is my orientation: I’m attracted to guys, not girls. People don’t choose their orientation. Some people use the word temptations to describe their orientation.

2. Lust. A lot of people confuse orientation with lust, but they’re not the same thing at all. Lust is more than just being attracted to someone; it has to do with how you respond to those attractions in your mind. Lust is a sin regardless of whether you’re lusting for women, men, or even your neighbor’s snazzy new car. The same Greek word translated lust in the Bible also means covet. (More on this in another post.)

3. Sex. This is really what most people are talking about when they say that “homosexuality is a sin.” They mean that they disapprove of gay sex, but to someone like me, it sounds like you just disapprove of my unchosen orientation.

4. Relationship. When gay people talk about wanting to get married, it’s not sex they’re after, but rather, a relationship.Just as straight people (hopefully) don’t get married for the sex, gay people don’t either; we want love, commitment, understanding, and someone to come home to at night and talk about our day. For Christians who disapprove of gay sex, a challenging question can be how to respond to gay relationships. If there’s no sex in the relationship but there is romance, is it still acceptable? And would you assume two gay people are having sex if you see them holding hands? (Would you assume a straight couple is having sex if you see them holding hands?)

I said that there are four main things someone might mean when they talk about homosexuality, but there’s actually a fifth one. For many folks (and I confess this was true of me as well for years), the word homosexuality conjures up images of debauchery, promiscuity, and the worst stereotypes of the gay community (my insert of video helping to perpetuate this point). But of course, that’s not what it is to be gay at all, just as images of Mardi Gras don’t convey what it is to be straight.

So next time you hear someone tell you what their view of homosexuality is, challenge them to be more specific. What are they really talking about?

Whether you are a gay affirming or condemning person it seems beneficial to us all that we understand the implied meaning on the words we are using. We might just come to place of understanding with each other

NOTE: I often get asked about curriculum for churches and youth groups in approaching gay rights and spirituality. My best suggestion to answer this question is the “This I Know” study. Personally I think it should be a youth and adult series as both groups would benefit from hearing from each other while talking through the study sessions. The movie they companion with “For the Bible Tells Me So” is also available on Netflix (at least the last time I checked). The film in itself is a great discussion starter.

Changes in Attitude, Changes in Latitude, Changes in Gay Marriage

June 11, 2011 By Gavin Richardson

There is a interesting set up graphs from the Pew Research group on the peoples perception/view of gay marriage categorized by groupings.

Some quick thoughts:

  • Not surprising that an overall divide of opinion is about half & half (graph 1)
  • Not surprised to see that the youngest generations are more in favor of a gay marriage (graph 2). Percentages have exceeded a majority which is interesting and also lends to a huge divide in values between a church’s viewpoint (graph 3).
  • Not surprising is the breakdown of the Christian faith categories. Though I might say that such a high differential between the Catholic and Mainline Protestant views & the Religiously Unaffiliated. Again, a huge values divide there (graph 3)
  • Was kinda surprised a more moderate voice in the Republican party didn’t bring the political viewpoint a little bit closer to the Democratic / Independent view (which are almost identical). Though a difference is expected, it was a huge divide there and is probably that hill many republican conservatives are willing to die, or live/campaign on (graph 4).
  • Graph 5 is probably right where I’d expect our culture. Conservatives & Liberals are riding their lines and are quite set in those. The Moderates might be like me, you’d favor it, but you are not sure that it is in the whole country’s interest to force it so you’d opt for a conservative/cautious approach. Some then are probably just good either way.

One thing was plugging at my thoughts reading this. An institution, like my church tribe, cannot survive with one or two generations of people apathy towards it. There needs to be some reconciliation that would bring some relational & passionate connection towards the Gen X’ers & Millennials, not to mention the generation after Millennials who are probably going to be more affirming, within the church so that it can survive a values divide. Tough call there as a theology could be debated on either side and the long tradition of the church leans against. Changing just because culture is shifting isn’t the most divine way to change, but it has done so for less than divine reasons before.. Tough call, but a call that needs to be made sometime soon or continue a slow death

Copyright © 2025 gavoweb | contact gavin richardson · Log in