this is the first official response to the terminations of the children’s and youth director positions. prior thoughts to think-tank, what focus on, listening, white boy asks why, reminded of, hearing voices, letter too, the timeline, petition
Beyond the Walls-Restructuring of the Conference Council on Connectional Ministries (CCOCM)
By Loyd Mabry,
Director of Connectional MinistriesOur theme for the 2008 Session of the Tennessee Annual Conference is Beyond the Walls. This concept is taken from Adam Hamilton’s book entitled,
Leading Beyond the Walls. He will be a guest speaker and presenter on Tuesday of Annual
Conference. The emphasis in his book is developing congregations with a heart for the unchurched. It is my hope that this theme and emphasis, Beyond the
Walls, will become a driving force for us in the Tennessee Conference.In 2007 the Annual Conference approved the report of the CCOCM Task Force. The Task Force presented a change in the way the CCOCM functions. The new model is based in four words-Engage, Receive, Equip, and Send. We are called to engage the community around us. We are called to offer them Christ and receive them into our midst. Our calling continues as we equip persons for the ongoing ministry of the church and theses equipped persons are sent out to engage their communities. The cycle is to continue.
To pursue this direction, a restructuring of the CCOCM staff resulted. For the conference to change direction, to reach different people, to minister in different ways, to reach out beyond the walls changes in job
descriptions became evident. The result is restructuring of the CCOCM staff and the way it
functions. These changes in staff are not related to job performance. The CCOCM program staff fulfills their present job descriptions. With a changing job description and direction, it was felt that staff changes were necessary. The infusion of new ideas, methods, and styles of ministry is needed for us to fully engage the world around us. Again, let me say that the change in staffing is a result of changes in job descriptions not job performance.Our calling as God’s people is to make Disciples of Jesus Christ for the transformation of the world.
Connectional Ministries is charged with the responsibility to empower, equip, and enable local churches, districts, and the annual conference in fulfilling this calling.To accomplish this calling we must go beyond the walls and reach out to the people around us. Jesus
said "Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and
of the Son and of the Holy Spirit and teaching them to obey everything that I have commanded you. And remember, I am with your always to the end of the age."
what do you think?
my thoughts. it at least keeps some credibility of beth & susan’s
work. still, it never approaches the way that this vision never took
into account to talk to the people who are invested in the ministry or
the whole change of jobs was never properly communicated.
a few sentences that are interesting. "With a changing job description and direction, it was felt that staff
changes were necessary. The infusion of new ideas, methods, and styles
of ministry is needed for us to fully engage the world around us."
i
ask who is supposed to come up with these new ideas? and who is
supposed to facilitate them? why new ideas had to result in stifling
current effective ministries? i have the bishop in spoken record and
email, that he doesn’t know how to reach these unchurched youth and
children, so then why don’t you talk to those who might have an idea? to his credit, the bishop has been speaking with me and others and has been apologetic and assuming responsibility for the changes, but as we know, the bishop works on assumptions that others are doing their work to communicate for his office and communicate to his office thorough information.
we
still need to know why those who are invested in these ministries, and
know those who are "unchurched" were never included in conversations. i
think too, it needs to be brought to attention that if we are to reach
"unchurched" does that forgo "making disciples of all people" that i
thought our church was working under for many years.
do we need to ask
that much of any church growth comes at the loss of members of another
church? most churches are not reaching new converts in any statistical
mass, only recycling people who have left another church body. maybe
our adult ministries over the conference needs new ideas and all that. we eliminated our associate position as well, no one seems up in arms about that one because the position holder was pretty much known to say "i don’t do anything" but we have a new description and the person who is waiting in the wings to be hired for it, a former DS. it is pretty much
accepted that she is going to take over that position. i have that on
good account from a not so secret rumor and confirmation with a friend in the personnel
committee. does she have new ideas? i don’t see these new ideas
expressly reflected in her job posting.
we have two meetings scheduled for conversation and planning. one by our ccym & core design team members, the other with our cabinet, personnel committee, director of connection ministries, our bishop, youth council, children’s council, camping committee, and young adult council as well. how do i expect that to go?
Kurt says
Dude, reading that letter made me want to vomit. It said nothing of substance at all. Well, perhaps between the lines it said, “we’re doin’ it our way, and you can’t stop us.”
This isn’t ministry discernment. It’s gambling. And not even the kind of gambling that requires the use of some sort of feasible strategy or a modicum of skill. It’s like picking the duck out of the tub at the county fair. Or BINGO. Or roulette–played by Russian rules.
And what does the Discipline say about gambling?
It’s a menace to society.
Kurt says
Dude, reading that letter made me want to vomit. It said nothing of substance at all. Well, perhaps between the lines it said, “we’re doin’ it our way, and you can’t stop us.”
This isn’t ministry discernment. It’s gambling. And not even the kind of gambling that requires the use of some sort of feasible strategy or a modicum of skill. It’s like picking the duck out of the tub at the county fair. Or BINGO. Or roulette–played by Russian rules.
And what does the Discipline say about gambling?
It’s a menace to society.
gavin says
what bothers me most about this letter kurt which could be of the same nature as what you bring up. this was a supposed to be a letter that affirms the people who were currently in these positions and dispel bad information by the conference office, the cabinet and others that they refused to change. and therefore were fired.
this letter does affirm them which is helpful. it goes on to say how this change came about, but if it is going to say how it came about i feel it is only necessary that it apologizes for all the ways that it was not faithful to the structural systems of the traditions of the methodist church.
that bothers me.
gavin says
what bothers me most about this letter kurt which could be of the same nature as what you bring up. this was a supposed to be a letter that affirms the people who were currently in these positions and dispel bad information by the conference office, the cabinet and others that they refused to change. and therefore were fired.
this letter does affirm them which is helpful. it goes on to say how this change came about, but if it is going to say how it came about i feel it is only necessary that it apologizes for all the ways that it was not faithful to the structural systems of the traditions of the methodist church.
that bothers me.